3 week iteration中的測試工作
Testing Tasks in a 3 week iteration
http://www.testcommon.com/content.php?cid=918
在網路上我找到, 別人如何對3 週的iteration, 安排testing的工作.
首先這是他規劃的測試工作: (這裡是6RD對1 QA)
* 2 days in the daily scrums and administrative meetings.
* 1 day in some form of review with developers on feature implementations, bugs, test approach, XP test pairs, etc.
* 2 days creating, or updating the test cases (low priority, time permitting).
* 5 days on feature testing the new/modified features and residual bug fixes.
* 2 days of strategic long-term tasks ie performance tests, automating regressions, environment build-up/clean-up (the lowest priority until critical to the functional testing)
* 3 days regression testing (not complete regression, only a partial, evolving regression subject to features changed)
這是他執行後實際的工作狀況:
* 1-2 days on the combination of scrums and design/developer discussions
* <1 day on combination of test planning, test case maintenance and development of strategic test tasks
* 3 days investigating field support issues and rumors of bugs
* 1 day rebuilding/recovering the test environment for particular feature tests
* 1 day on regression testing the final build(s)
* 8 days or more on feature and bug testing
這裡是另一個iterative的pratice, 它是一家startup 公司的例子. (這裡是3RD對1QA) 基本上, 這家公司的feature 管理很混亂, 並沒有適當的document給QA, 或是和QA提醒一些implementation的改變.
所以他的規劃如下:
* <1 day in all combinations of scrum, discussions, test planning, test case and environment maintenance
* 2 days (and ever increasing) investigations of field reported issues
* 1 day regression testing the prior iteration after it completed
* 11 days on feature and bug fix verification and exploratory/ad-hoc testing
看完他的規劃後, 我很好奇幾點:
1. 它如何有這麼長的測試時間? 我的意思是RD如何這麼快deliver東西出來, 我很好奇他們是如何做開發設計的
2. 還是說他所謂的測試, 不只包含test case 的execution, 可能還有一些inpsection, static analysis?
3. 或者是說他其實包含對前一 iteration的功能持續在做測試?
4. 或者是說RD 的unit testing 他也算進去?
不知各位看倌, 你們的經驗或是作法是什麼?
Testing Tasks in a 3 week iteration
http://www.testcommon.com/content.php?cid=918
在網路上我找到, 別人如何對3 週的iteration, 安排testing的工作.
首先這是他規劃的測試工作: (這裡是6RD對1 QA)
* 2 days in the daily scrums and administrative meetings.
* 1 day in some form of review with developers on feature implementations, bugs, test approach, XP test pairs, etc.
* 2 days creating, or updating the test cases (low priority, time permitting).
* 5 days on feature testing the new/modified features and residual bug fixes.
* 2 days of strategic long-term tasks ie performance tests, automating regressions, environment build-up/clean-up (the lowest priority until critical to the functional testing)
* 3 days regression testing (not complete regression, only a partial, evolving regression subject to features changed)
這是他執行後實際的工作狀況:
* 1-2 days on the combination of scrums and design/developer discussions
* <1 day on combination of test planning, test case maintenance and development of strategic test tasks
* 3 days investigating field support issues and rumors of bugs
* 1 day rebuilding/recovering the test environment for particular feature tests
* 1 day on regression testing the final build(s)
* 8 days or more on feature and bug testing
這裡是另一個iterative的pratice, 它是一家startup 公司的例子. (這裡是3RD對1QA) 基本上, 這家公司的feature 管理很混亂, 並沒有適當的document給QA, 或是和QA提醒一些implementation的改變.
所以他的規劃如下:
* <1 day in all combinations of scrum, discussions, test planning, test case and environment maintenance
* 2 days (and ever increasing) investigations of field reported issues
* 1 day regression testing the prior iteration after it completed
* 11 days on feature and bug fix verification and exploratory/ad-hoc testing
看完他的規劃後, 我很好奇幾點:
1. 它如何有這麼長的測試時間? 我的意思是RD如何這麼快deliver東西出來, 我很好奇他們是如何做開發設計的
2. 還是說他所謂的測試, 不只包含test case 的execution, 可能還有一些inpsection, static analysis?
3. 或者是說他其實包含對前一 iteration的功能持續在做測試?
4. 或者是說RD 的unit testing 他也算進去?
不知各位看倌, 你們的經驗或是作法是什麼?
全站熱搜
留言列表
